Skip to content

SEEK JUSTICE

header-1

 Charlene & Jonathan with Siblings & Baby LilyCharlene & Jonathan with Siblings

& Baby Lily (DOB: 01/13/07 & DOD: 03/28/07)

(photo taken March, 2007)

I was trying to recover to some degree, from our loss of income, loss of gainful employment, loss of reputation and loss my investment in 2352 Smith Street, Regina, SK and cope with work and a growing family at our ages to consider doing a lawsuit on my own. Charlene was suffering severely from post-trauma reactions which was leaving her and me chronically sleep deprived. Doing a lawsuit where some research would be needed, to even attempt this, had to be put’ on my back-burner’.

In June 2003 I was made aware that this ministry had a plan to place Destiny’s last child with her birth family on the reserve and then to get Leslie her third child and then Charlene and Jonathan.

My story began with Part One The Adoption, where were I first experienced their political manipulations and lies.

This same experience of lies and half truths and deceptions continued, as detailed in Part Two – Protection of the Children.

Like a ‘domino effect’ from Part Three right back to Part One.

Without Part Three of this lawsuit it may not have occurred. Although Part Two was at the heart of this lawsuit I had not decided to try to litigate them on my own at least not right then.

The lies, deceptions, slander, manipulations and now their aggressive acts of two hostile evictions, finally left me no choice but to litigate them.

I determined that this was ‘continuous injury’. Charlene knew who hurt her and her brother, at least she knew those like her parents and her auntie, but she did not know who those were that had masks on.

Destiny’s fourth child, Lyle, came into our custody [October, 2003]. At the end of July or thereafter, in 2003 I came into possession of two doctors’ reports on Lyle that shocked me. As a professional nurse (non-active) and having taught nursing, I had read many doctors’ reports but none like these.

  • All of the doctors actions (added as defendants to lawsuit QBG. 1306 0f A.D. 2005) including the psychologist, had the potential to put Charlene and Jonathan in danger and had direct implications for the well-being and safety of their siblings to follow.

* Ethical practices and ‘common-sense’ (sound judgment) was severely lacking-and in some cases even absent. Here is one such example: After reading the doctor’s report on our youngest grandchild (late 2003) and taking in her appraisal of my daughter’s husband having stating that he had no history of violence towards children or a history of familial violence made me reflect on the following:

  1. This doctor’s description of Destiny’s husband had me realize that she was ill-informed and/or dismissive of the fact that her husband was in the Native Syndicate.
  2. Was she aware that Leslie’s foster mother picked her up just hours before Destiny’s husband went on a knife wielding rampage trying to stab my daughter as she ran out into the frigid night and hid.
  3. When Destiny was not available to stab, he went across the hall to his brother’s apartment and stabbed him just missing his heart. This stabbing made the news and the Leader Post. Is he or is he not a danger to members of his own family?
  4. This doctor allowed herself to be a pawn for this senior protection worker who knew all this information which was at her disposal. The protection worker involved, discounted Charlene’s accounts of what she’d reported, ignored the No Contact Order in place and threw ‘caution to the wind’ and placed Destiny’s third child (Leslie) with Destiny and her husband for consecutive overnight visits during the Christmas holidays in 2000.

These doctors could not have had direct knowledge of what they were documenting or made inferences about the criminal behaviors of those whom Charlene named as her abusers. Repeating hearsay is not their role or ethical and such remarks carry the potential of compromising their protection.

When it comes to our most vulnerable, government appointed doctors and judges need to stop being pawns for such ‘politically-correct’ agendas.

What Charlene experienced and what is documented on her website http://www.voicesofthebruised-reeds.com along with her medical and bio-psychosocial reports validates this. 

This same doctor who claimed that Lyle’s dad (Destiny’s husband at the time) was ‘not a risk to children’, insist and ed and documented in this medical report of him, that I am semi-delusional to believe that my daughter was involved in a satanic cult where babies were being sacrificed. She is a medical doctor and not a psychiatrist.

Had the children been returned to them it would be inexcusable and would have put them ‘at risk’.  This was the direction they were going and they had to be STOPPED and a lawsuit was the only way for me to ‘put the brakes on’.

When it comes to vulnerable babies and children we must never do what is deemed politically correct but what is the best practice for their safety and well-being.

We were left with NO HELP – NO SUPPORT and the doctors involved with this ‘integrated sexual abuse team’ who now were also our adversaries, because of the ‘authority and power’ which they wielded.

* The doctor’s reports on the two youngest siblings are not published at least not until they reach 18 years of age.

  • Part Three was this ministry’s payback for questioning them and for my stance to protect my grandchildren. Payback continues to this very day, because telling this story-my story, which must NEVER be repeated for any baby or child or family, is not ‘politically correct‘.
  • Please read the Claim Part Three for details. Realizing they were still impacting our business with hearsay and counting the cost to our family on all levels, I knew I had to litigate them ‘to stop the bleed’.                                        * All documents are filed at the Regina Court House where anyone can read them as they are not under a publication ban or under a sealing order-nor can the court put one on as the Court of Appeal (SK) has no authority to do so. Further the courts struck it, that is, it was thrown-out!
  • Refer to link: https://www.scribd.com/doc/230107498/Disclaimer-No-Sealing-Orde

I sat down to ‘write my story’ to seek justice for my grandchildren, my husband and I, and yes my children, who now had most of their inheritance ripped from them with these evictions. I hope this song sung by this sweet and talented 7 year old girl will bless you.

Should your energy or strength seem so low that you want to give-up as I often did on this legal journey, this song will encourage you knowing that God is with you and will raise you up above whatever you are facing. Connie Talbot – You raise me up (High quality)

 

This song reminds me that I never did this lawsuit on my own. I knew He was with me through it all & is always…for

I Am Not Alone – Kari Jobe

 

 

Be First to Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.